Why control systems at harvest time must not fail

5 min read
Patrik Schlegel
Patrik Schlegel
Owner & CEO, SF Elektro-Engineering AG · Flums
Last checked: October 16, 2026

First things first

Grain collection points cannot tolerate downtime during harvesting because the time window is tight and non-negotiable. Obsolescence often affects not just a central control system but several historically grown subsystems with different life cycles. By checking early per subsystem and planning traceability from the outset, you significantly reduce the risk of an expensive outage.

At SF Electro-Engineering we repeatedly see the same pattern in this context: It is not the technology itself that is the problem, but the moment you touch it. When harvest is underway, every hour counts, so planning must be in place before the season starts, not during it.

Why is a grain collection point particularly vulnerable?

A grain collection point operates with an extreme peak load in a tightly defined time window. At the GCF Wohlen collection point, the intake capacity during harvest is 2,500 tons per day, and this performance must be available without interruption. Unlike systems with uniform utilization, this moment cannot be postponed.

This makes an unplanned control system failure during these weeks significantly more critical than in many other industries. This is also visible at Landi-Messen, because the historically grown silo systems must continuously carry the high tempo of the supply chain.

2'500 Tonnen pro TagAnnahmevermögen zur Erntezeit bei GCF Wohlen
25'000 tGesamtspeichervermögen der modernisierten Anlage in GCF Wohlen
rund 2'300 DatenpunkteZusammengeführte Datenpunkte in GCF Wohlen
20 ET200SP-StationenDezentrale Stationen in der Lösung für GCF Wohlen

SF Elektro-Engineering AG

How is obsolescence distributed in such systems?

Obsolescence in grain collection points is often not concentrated in a single core system, but spread across many subsystems. For Landi-Messen, components such as grinding mills, mixers, cube presses, storage, drying, aspiration, and loading had to be networked. Each of these units may come from a different expansion phase and thus have its own lifecycle status.

From our experience, this coexistence makes the inventory more labor-intensive than for a single machine. In a recently conducted audit, we found an active power supply next to SIMATIC S7-400 assemblies with officially announced product discontinuation and an OP77B for which there is no pure software migration path left. For planning, this means: you do not just check the control, but each subsystem with its own condition and dependencies. The ability to track the movement and history of products and their components across different production, processing, and distribution stages.
— SF Elektro-Engineering AG, Kompetenzseite Rückverfolgbarkeit von Daten

Why is traceability today part of retrofit?

Traceability has long been a mandatory program in this industry. Requirements include batch numbers, quantity capture, and recipe management, for example in bagging and bagging processes. Older control systems from the S5 or early S7-300 generations were often planned before these data requirements became standard. Therefore retrofit is rarely just about spare parts provision. Often it is the moment when the plant becomes traceable.

How does SF Elektro-Engineering implement this in practice?

For the agricultural sector, SF Elektro-Engineering uses the sfAGROone industry solution. It bundles productivity gains, safety and standards, databases and interfaces, and plant availability—precisely the four aspects that come together at a seasonally timed grain collection point.

ProjectTechnical implementationSpecial feature
GCF WohlenS7-1518-F with 20 decentralized ET200SP stationsAbout 2,300 data points, operation via sfAGROone
Landi-MessenS7-1512SP with ET200SPPreparations and test runs in the in-house lab
Landi-MessenNetworking of seven subsystemsDigitized automatic operation for several parallel processes
Selected reference projects in the agricultural sector

For Landi-Messen, it was crucial that the preparation phase and test runs took place in the in-house laboratory. This allowed latent problems to be addressed before the scheduled plant shutdown, and the retrofit on site stayed within the planned time window.

That is exactly the lever in a grain collection point: testing in advance shortens downtime where it cannot be postponed.

What should be planned before the next harvest?

  • Set the retrofit window clearly outside the harvest period, not only after a fault occurs.
  • Carry out the inventory subsystem by subsystem, not just check the central control.
  • Consider traceability from the start, so batch and quantity capture do not have to be retrofitted later.

If you operate a grain collection point with older Siemens components, do not anchor the lifecycle to a single assembly. What matters is the interaction of all subsystems, the data requirements, and the retrofit at the right time window.

Frequently asked questions

When is the best time for retrofit in a grain collection point?
Best to plan the retrofit outside the harvest period, because that window is the least flexible. If you only react after a fault, a technical measure quickly becomes a business risk. SF Elektro-Engineering therefore recommends early planning before the next season.
Is it enough to check only the central control?
No, for grain collection points this is usually not enough. The systems often consist of several historically grown subsystems with different lifecycles. Therefore, inventory should be conducted subsystem by subsystem.
Why is traceability during retrofit so important?
Because requirements for batches, quantities, and recipes are part of the basic equipment today. Older controls were often designed before these requirements, so retrofit is often the right time to make the plant traceable.
How does sfAGROone help with seasonally loaded systems?
sfAGROone bundles the aspects of availability, safety and standards, databases and interfaces, and productivity. This exact combination is important for a grain collection point, because several requirements must be met simultaneously during the harvest window.

Crucially, it is not only the lifespan of individual components but the control of the grain collection point as a whole. If you plan the retrofit early, by subsystem, with traceability in mind, you protect harvest downtime from unnecessary interruptions.

If you want to categorize the lifecycle of your control system at the grain collection point before the next season, now is the time to take the next step with an experienced partner in industrial automation.

Steuerung der Getreidesammelstelle prüfen

SF Elektro-Engineering AG, Flums

Beratung anfragen